Should people be blamed for using an unknown USB stick?
According to Bloomberg, The U.S. Department of Homeland Security tested government staff to see if they would pick-up and use CDs and USB sticks found in the parking lot. The result was of course bad, 60% of the people plugged in the found media in the office computer, 90% was plugged in if the media was branded with the official logo. This is no surprise, but of course shocking for IT-security personnel.
Bruce Schneier commented on this, by saying that the problem is not the people, it is the USB sticks. "Quit blaming the victim" Schneier says. I am bound to agree with Schneier.
The tests, conducted by The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, shows that IT-security policies is not enough. IT-security policies can dictate any demands but the users must be supported in their security awareness.
Creating security awareness is a hard thing to do. The users must be aided in a technical way. Blocking all insecure USB-sticks and only allowing e.g. encrypted sticks or SecuriRAM, can be one way to get through to the users and saying: -Insecure USB sticks are dangerous stuff, don’t use them, and don’t touch them.
Below you will see my short-list of how to support your users and to improve USB stick security.
- Educate the personnel of the risks with USB sticks
- Block auto start and U3
- Update the operating system as soon as the security patches are released
- Keep the virus protection updated
- Use a USB port blocking software and allow only known USB sticks (white listing)
- Keep track of the USB sticks, remove lost USB sticks from white list
- Use secure USB sticks e.g. encrypted sticks or SecuriRAM
Comments
Michael
Wed, 08/31/2011 - 14:18
Permalink
Should people be blamed for
Should people be blamed for using an unknown USB stick?
Simple answer - YES, they should, in some sense, but of course the organizations need to take full measures to avoid this from happening. The biggest security threats there are in an organization is the people. If such ppl aren't educated they will continue to be security threats.
http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/frame/2011/071811wan1.html
Add new comment